MANUAL
time required
∼10 h
per review
AI
time required
∼ 4 h
per review
AI workflow: Multi-bidder comparison – cluster term sheets + highlight deviations → reach your negotiating position faster
Introduction
When there are several bidders at the table, it is not the one with the longest memo who wins, but the one with the clearest comparison matrix. The bottleneck: conditions differ subtly—and it is easy to overlook "small" clauses with a big impact.
use case
DEALPOINT created:
- Term sheet extraction: purchase price logic, earn-out, WC mechanism, escrow, W&I, closing conditions
- Comparison matrixfor all bidders
- Deviation highlights(“Bidder A: better at X, riskier at Y”)
- Quotes/referencesin the term sheets/LOIs
Why DEALPOINT DMS works better
- Everything in the deal workspace:term sheets, emails, attachments, versions—consistent.
- Rapid iteration:With new versions, the matrix updates itself with traceable change logic.
- Partner-ready output:Export as memo/slide outline without manual copy errors.
procedure
- Mark term sheets/LOIs in the room
- DEALPOINT extracts terms and builds the comparison matrix
- Team adds negotiation labels (must-have/trade-off)
- Export for Steering/Partner/Client
time saving
- Manual: 4–10 hours (per round, depending on the number of bidders)
- With DEALPOINT: 1.5–4 hours Review/fine-tuning
Savings: 2.5–6 hours per round
For 2–3 rounds: ~5–18 hours